Skip to content

Halo Board Electric Skateboard Reviews

Completing amidst the pack, the Carbon Fiber release of the Halo Board was generally unremarkable when contrasted with the gathering of boards that we have investigated. It is a strong center engine board with a respectable range and is decently rapid, yet battles with the more extreme slopes and doesn’t have the best brakes. We likewise observed the client support to be not as much as accommodating. The majority of this, joined with its exceptional value, make it difficult to prescribe this board over its rivals.

Execution Comparison

To rank electric skateboards and see which one proved to be the best, we concocted a thorough arrangement of tests, isolated among six weighted rating measurements. These were: Speed, Range, Hills, Ride, Build, and Braking, each getting weight corresponding to its significance. Each board got a general score from 0-100 in view of its appearing in every one of these measurements, with the accompanying areas itemizing how the Halo Board performed and why it scored how it did and also get the halo board coupons from this website which will be useful for you.


Gaining the most weight out of the majority of our rating measurements, Speed was of foremost significance in our test. This metric made up 25% of the aggregate score, with the Halo Board conveying a tolerable appearing, justifying a 7 out of 10 for its endeavors. We tried both the increasing speed of each board and also its best speed, to decide the score in this metric.

The board felt somewhat shaky at its best speed, wobbling marginally, yet not giving us undue reason for concern.

Nonetheless, this model couldn’t convey its best level execution into the second trial of this metric: Acceleration. The Halo Board Carbon was about normal, taking around 5.17 seconds to finish our 50′ test track when beginning from a stop — fundamentally more than the 3.17 seconds of the best model.


Positioning second to speed, our Range metric assumes acknowledgment for the following biggest bit of the general score — 20%. We looked at to what extent each board endured on level ground with a conservative riding profile and in addition to what extent it took each board to charge. Our analyzer is a normal estimated, 6′ grown-up male, so lighter riders may make it further and heavier riders a shorter separation, however the general positioning of boards ought to stay predictable. The Halo Board Carbon again conveyed a strong execution in this metric, winning a 7 out of 10 for its execution.


Following Range, Ride included the following biggest segment of the aggregate score, assuming liability for 20% of the aggregate score. This metric comprised of assessing and contrasting how agreeable each board is with the ride, how well it took care of the uneven and harsh landscape, sudden splits, and which board we were by and large attracted to. The Halo Board Carbon didn’t especially inspire us in this arrangement of tests, gaining a 5 out of 10 for its generally dull execution.

This board did not deal with splits in the street well by any means. It was a to a great degree shaking background to hit a break with any kind of speed on this board. This board is additionally very appalling at crossing rough landscape. It’s an extraordinarily rough ride if the street isn’t superbly smooth and is certainly not an exceptionally charming knowledge. In any case, this board is very agreeable to ride on level ground, with a strong stage. In general, we were sensibly attracted to this board and would pick it on a semi-visit premise — in the event that we knew the street was smooth.


Our Hills metric records for 15% of the aggregate score, and consistent with its name evaluated the ability of each board at climbing slopes. We went up progressively more extreme slopes until the point that the board could never again influence it to up at a sensible speed, utilizing the most extreme review of slope moved to decide the score. The Halo Board Carbon didn’t do especially well, winning a 4 out of 10 for it’s not as much as stellar execution.

This model made it up a 10% review, yet scarcely. It would just make it up this slope on the off chance that we hit it at speed, neglecting to make it up to anything more extreme than around 3.5% review from a halt in our tests. This is generously not as much as the producer’s asserted slope climbing capacity. At the point when reached about this, we were told our board must not have been charged. Our tests were directed subsequent to permitting the board a lot of time to totally charge, so we are as yet sitting tight for a clarification of this error. Until further notice, however, you might need to consider an elective alternative in the event that you are anticipating heading up soak slopes with your board.


Next up is our Build metric, representing 10% of the aggregate score. We looked at how much each board gauged, how the remote felt in your grasp, how responsive the board was to directions from the remote, regardless of whether the board had regenerative braking, lastly, how responsive and supportive the client benefit is for each board. The Halo Board didn’t do awfully well, procuring a 5 out of 10 for its no matter how you look at it normal form.

Comments are closed